Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Michael Olson's avatar

I was asked to compare Everything Everywhere All At Once, Smile, and Barbarian for their ability to last. My basic answer was that the movies with the most relatable elements will last. They’re all fun and entertaining in their own ways so that might save them. EEAAO has universal themes even if its style quirks might not last. Smile has a universal concept but it is in danger of running flat. It might lose effectiveness over time. Barbarian is so specific to a specific set of experiences that I don’t think it’ll last for that reason. But all are creative and new enough. However, I don’t live in Florida and Crawl works because it’s about survival. Jaws, though effective, I was more scared of Piranha because I live in lake country. Jaws works because of the relationships within. That lasts. Game of Thrones is about Home and Family. Train to Busan will last because of that relationship between Father and daughter. Blah blah etc. I could go on.

Universal themes matter. I think that’s what’s missing from a lot of movies now. Truth. Tone and Intent matter. Truth.

Expand full comment
Paul Rachman's avatar

Many films spearheaded change. Speaking from mid 20th century on, from The 400 Blows, and Breathless, to The Wedding Banquet and Pulp Fiction to Moonlight and many others. In the ecosystem that these films existed there were bigger counted audience numbers, more distributors, more critics, in essence a bigger petri dish where things grow. I am not sure that EAAO can truly be that film right now by itself? Where and what are the missing ingredients to make that energy come back? The old ones aren't resurfacing? To start actual "viewing" numbers would be a breakthrough both fiscally and critically. People throw the YouTube view numbers around like crazy. WHat's it going to take the cinema tech industry to do the same ???

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts